Given your roles as educators or instructional designers, how do you see yourself overcome some of the challenges discussed in this week’s materials? (Be specific) give at least 2 concrete examples as to what the challenges are, and how you would go about addressing them.
- “A major challenge for instructional designers is faculty resistance to new pedagogies and deliveries” (Miller & Stein, 2014). In my position as a special education teacher at an elementary school, this challenge manifests in the form of a conflict between what the general education teacher is comfortable with and what technology is able to offer students with disabilities. An example of this conflict that I have recently experienced occurred when a general education teacher resisted using a research based reading intervention program called Imagine Learning. The student we shared had a disability that impacted his ability to develop early reading skills, which this program specifically addresses. My student was missing out on this intervention because the teacher did not understand how to use it. We worked around this issue by having the student come to my classroom during center time so that he could learn to use the program. This was not ideal, as it separated him unnecessarily from his same age peers, but parents agreed to the service. After the student was proficient in using the program, he remained with his classmates and used the program independently in his general education classroom. The continuing downside of this arrangement is that he is missing out on the supplemental features of the program, such as the printable activities that are designed to target his troublesome areas because his general education teacher is the only one with access to his profile. I am not this teacher’s boss. I am her peer. I can’t force her to incorporate these really cool, helpful features into her classroom routine. When I offer to show her how to use the program, she smiles politely but clearly has no interest. Still, all I can do is offer. To address conflicts like this in the future, I need time with my general education teachers to show them how the student’s tool works, how to troubleshoot it, and most of all, to assure them that I will be available to support the student whenever it is needed.
- “Faculty respond to administrative support in a variety of ways. For instance, they tend to resist top-down initiatives, but at the same time they have no respect for initiatives not supported by the top administration” (Miller & Stein, 2014). In my position, this problem manifests in a conflict between the technology recommended by a district specialist in an Individual Education Program, and the technology already in general use on campus. If a particular program or app is recommended, but is being used on a device that is not in general use (i.e. mandated by the district office for every school to use), such as an iPad, some teachers resist or just ignore the technology. The tool is seen as an “extra” that they are not responsible for understanding or managing. The feeling seems to be that the district specialist recommended it, so the specialist is the one responsible for it–even if the specialist is unlikely to return to our rural school for the rest of the school year and is based at the district office which is a 45 minute drive down the mountain. To address conflicts in this area I can offer my services to troubleshoot the device when needed, and to show the teacher and student how to use it so that the general ed teacher is not responsible for training the student.
Sources:
Miller, S. L. & Stein, G. K. (2016, February 8). Finding our voice: Instructional designers in higher education. Educause. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/2/finding-our-voice-instructional-designers-in-higher-education